News   Forum   Reviews   Articles   Where to Shop   Links   Polls   Submit News   DAP Shop  
New flash player from Napster
comment: 24 | Wednesday, June 28 (2006) 05:07PM | Posted by Michael
Napster is typically known for their subscription service, but yesterday they announced the release of a new Napster branded player. It's a 1GB player, and will have a color screen. The design looks nice and simple and will offer the following:

  • 1GB Capacity
  • Supported File Formats: MP3, WMA, WAV, MPEG4 (video) , JPEG (Photo)
  • Navigation: Robust Menu navigation including - Artist, Album, Track, Title, Genre, Playlist
  • Equalizer Settings: User adjusted, Pop, Classical, Jazz, Rock, Normal
  • Integrated FM radio tuner
  • Battery: Li-Polymer rechargeable battery (max playing time of 35 hours - MP3, 128 kbps)
  • Dimensions: 1.6 in × 3.15 in × .5 in
  • $119.95 Retail

Video playback and 35 hours of battery life, Nice!. Comparing this player to the competition, the only thing it's lacking is a higher capacity. A Napster subscription isn't required to use this player, but if you'd like to use it they have an offer for you.

Product Page


Napster is advertising a deal where you can get this player for just $50 if you agree to a year of Napster-To-Go service (or a cheapie 256mb player for Free). The service costs 14.95 a month for unlimited music to your player. Napster also revealed version 3.7 yesterday which features their new "PowerSync" Sync engine and other new enhancements that make it it faster and easier to transfer music to your player.

LINK (via, GenMP3)
Comments

chicubs

Comments: 915
Jun 28 (2006) 06:10PM  

oh great, now i have to change my napster review.




Steve

Comments: 1197
Jun 28 (2006) 06:49PM  

Haha




Lone

Comments: 973
Jun 28 (2006) 07:35PM  

Looks pretty nice except for capacity.




pecker

Comments: 501
Jun 28 (2006) 08:22PM  

uncluding?? im guessing you hit the wrong key lol??




Lone

Comments: 973
Jun 28 (2006) 08:25PM  

Lol, that's what Napsters' site says.




Michael
Location: New York City
Comments: 2786
Jun 28 (2006) 08:30PM  

Yeah, I spotted one of their errors "Supoprted" but I guess I missed that one, lol. What are the odds of them having two errors. sheesh.




Peacemaker636

Comments: 104
Jun 28 (2006) 08:49PM  

At first this looks like some half-baked dap that napster just threw out there for the hell of it, but upon reading the article, I see that this thing is actually pretty good! 35 hours battery life via built in battery! What's Ri-polymer? Or is that supposed to be Li-polymer?




Michael
Location: New York City
Comments: 2786
Jun 28 (2006) 09:36PM  

lol! Yeah that might just be another spelling mistake from Napster, unless someone can verify some sort of Rithium polymer




painkiller

Comments: 109
Jun 28 (2006) 10:26PM  

Not bad! Much better than I expected from Napster. If only they had larger storage capacity, this would be a fine contender against the nano.




Utew
Location: Oregon USA
Comments: 351
Jun 28 (2006) 10:56PM  

I've been looking for a good "half-baked" DAP with a Ri-polymer battery.. and the spelling errors give me hope that I may have found just the one....




kineticarl

Comments: 31
Jun 28 (2006) 11:07PM  

Funny that the song playing is "life for RENT". Not that I'm opposed to renting my music.
[ edited Jun 28 (2006) 11:07PM ]




Sunny Jintro

Comments: 15
Jun 29 (2006) 03:41AM  

looks nice, its really this kinda things that could win me over for subscription service. i guess we'll see more of this kind of offers....

is or will this be available in the EU?




PeterDLai
Location: San Diego/Los Angeles, California
Comments: 149
Jun 29 (2006) 05:04AM  

For those who are too lazy to calculate, an annual commitment of $14.95 per month for 12 months + the $50 charge for the MP3 player equals $229.40.




Steve

Comments: 1197
Jun 29 (2006) 09:26AM  

35 hour palyback makes me wonder if this uses the Sigmatel 3600. It would be ironic if this turns out to be the best player on the market.




Saijin_Naib
Location: Warren, NJ
Comments: 893
Jun 29 (2006) 09:34AM  

trapped with 1gb of storage :C




Lighter

Comments: 102
Jun 29 (2006) 09:38AM  

1gb storage might not be a killer for folks who are just renting music. If it's "easy" to use, then it's a matter of spending a bit of time every so often to reload.




Saijin_Naib
Location: Warren, NJ
Comments: 893
Jun 29 (2006) 09:39AM  

mmmm.. this is true.. I dont use music subscriptions, so the whole idea of it is kinda beyond me. I have my CD rips and I need mass storage because to me the whole point is lugging all my music around with me, just minus the lugging part.




PeterDLai
Location: San Diego/Los Angeles, California
Comments: 149
Jun 29 (2006) 04:10PM  

Someone review this. I'm actually interested.




Michael
Location: New York City
Comments: 2786
Jun 29 (2006) 04:12PM  

I just might be Peter




musicman

Comments: 336
Jun 29 (2006) 06:30PM  

"1gb storage might not be a killer for folks who are just renting music."

One of the attractions of renting music is that you can theoretically download every single track Napster has (2 Million +). 1GB will let you store roughly 250 tracks, they haven't really thought this through have they?




Michael
Location: New York City
Comments: 2786
Jun 29 (2006) 06:35PM  

They want you to actually use the program more often. You can download and refill your player with music easier than ever with the new version. I'm sure they've thought that through. Sure it'd be nice to have more, but a lot of people still are perfectly fine with a gig or less of space.
[ edited Jun 29 (2006) 09:05PM ]




Steve

Comments: 1197
Jun 29 (2006) 06:37PM  


One of the attractions of renting music is that you can theoretically download every single track Napster has (2 Million +). 1GB will let you store roughly 250 tracks, they haven't really thought this through have they?


I don't know how rental music works - I might never, but can't you just download ulimited songs to your hard drive, or do you have to only download what can fit on the player?




Will

Comments: 75
Jun 29 (2006) 08:20PM  

You can download as much as fits on your hard drive. From there you can transfer the songs you want onto your DAP just like bought music.




timmins

Comments: 270
Jun 29 (2006) 11:10PM  

long live bitorrent, my justifacation for using it is that most of my downloads are old or dead jazz guys who wouldn't end up getting any money, plus I'm broke. Once records labels start releasing good music, I might begin to support them, I watch my consumerism, plus I'm just a bit of an anti-conformist, that's why I bought a UMS device, even though I use none of the extra features.




You must be logged in to make comments on this site - please log in, or if you are not registered click here to signup







User Reviews   Privacy Policy